VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
Tracey BirdsallWilliam KircherDaz CrawfordStephen Manley
DIRECTOR
Neil Johnson
SYNOPSICS
Rogue Warrior: Robot Fighter (2016) is a English movie. Neil Johnson has directed this movie. Tracey Birdsall,William Kircher,Daz Crawford,Stephen Manley are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2016. Rogue Warrior: Robot Fighter (2016) is considered one of the best Action,Sci-Fi movie in India and around the world.
More
Rogue Warrior: Robot Fighter (2016) Trailers
Same Actors
Rogue Warrior: Robot Fighter (2016) Reviews
I'm a Sex Toy!
Sienna (Tracey Birdsall) is the girl on the cover who looks like Pamela Anderson. Unfortunately her acting ability is about the same. The hairy guy who looks like a Wookie, so we can mistake this for another film, dies in the first scene. This is a post apocalyptic earth in a war of humans vs AI and some AI on our side. We have wormholes and can do Terra-forming, but the idea of separating humans and AI by the length of half the galaxy is out of the question. The plot becomes twisty as Sienna is a complex character, one that was ill conceived and not well played. On the plus side the special effects and cleavage was good. Sienna runs a bit like a girly-girl. Note to self, get rid of the heels during the apocalypse. I was bored with the story and lack of any likable characters. Attempts at humor didn't work as they search for "Hawking radiation." Writer/Director Neil Johnson has a cult following so expect questionable Amazon praise reviews. I find his science fiction attempts on the boring side while others love him. The feature has won 17 festival awards including Tracey Birdsall as an "actress" which I find as improbable as the current 8.9 (June30, 2017) rating at IMDb. I suggest there has been some ballot box stuffing by loyal fans and has nothing to do with the quality of the film. Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
Poor Acting and Film Making
All these actors and actresses are so bad at acting. The natural flow of human speech and conversation is missing. But they are not all to blame for this terrible movie. The director should have demanded more from his cast. Was director a sleep filming this movie, the locations, bad lighting and the demand for natural flow of speech and conversation was out the door. What was the producers thinking they should have caught all of this crap. With the Bad lighting and low budge and a bad script. Honestly this movie is a two if best. Just another B movie to add to the pile of bad scripts, actors and directors they all need to work on their craft a lot more before making another movie. The CGI save this movie from being a one. if that's anything. I don't have any experience I could do better on most of this lol.
Sorry but badest movie seen ever ,ad least for a 2017 movie
Glitering stars by all explosion's ,thats 1980 effects looks not real. The had even better movies in that time like Conan the destroyer ,back to the future ,we are now 2017 i expected for a 7.4 movie that it was a lot bether but for me its not worth thous stars ,only thing good done was the robots ,with more variation ,not always desert it could have been a good movie ,all robots got shutdown by that EM blast ,but she also a robot and she not get affected by it ,give me a break Sorry to tell but for me its not 7 stars + worth ,max maybe 3... Wasted my time watching this lol
"Mystery Science Theater 3000" Material
This was absolutely one of the worst movies I have seen! The story line, production values, acting, editing, just everything felt like it was made by high school kids in the AV (audio/visual) club. The first ONE minute, showing battles between the A.I.s and humans, was the best part of the movie, but it then immediately went downhill... scratch that... after the first minute it then plunged over the side of a cliff. The only good thing this movie has going for it is it is excellent material for "Mystery Science Theater 3000." In fact, while watching the movie I kept inserting my own jokes just to muddle my way through it, and that is how I immediately came upon the thought of "Mystery Science Theater 3000" and wishing I was watching it with them!
You need to watch this a few times
The best advice I can give is to go in to watching this one with no expectations. It fits a lot into a single film, requires a few times revisiting to catch all the small things they fit in there. The first time through you may be going "Wait, What?!" but on subsequent viewings a lot of the small things they fit in make sense. Really I would have rather seen this set as a multi part TV special as there's a lot of room to expand. Fortunately I've seen on the web that may be happening. I was lucky enough to go catch this at one of the showings in Los Angeles and went to buy a copy for myself afterwards. The Q&A there had a lot of information that makes some of the other reviews on her laughable. For instance they really did their own stunts in this. Skullcrusher, Sienna, Blister? They ran all over and fell and joked about all their injuries from doing so. The fact they spoke of how hot those days were added a lot of respect to those scenes in a wasteland. If they're sweating and grimacing that's real. Give me lens flares then, the struggle the Actors are going through is the real focus in this film. Sweeping character arcs are crammed in to the point if you only watch it once you may miss some of the events. There's a lot of them. This reminds me of the good old Sci-Fi days when you didn't bicker over special effects but the story and it had to be more than just techno-babble. There's action, there's drama, there are a lot of questions still needing to be answered. But in a way that leaves you curious. Give it a few watches, you'll need it.