Satyanweshi (2013) Reviews

• It's not a 'Byomkesh' film, Its a marital drama directed by ghosh, where BB features ! That's It

  souravsundarsamadder2013-09-07

  There are certain things that I wanted to write about the movie that left a bad taste in my mouth. Certain factors that have prompted me to organise a planchette and ask RG... WHY? But since I really don't want to critique 'The' Rituparno Ghosh's swan song, I would just enlist some points that might come in handy for anyone who's planning to watch 'Satyanweshi'... Things that work – The feel of the period shown, the location, the picturesque frames, the music (especially Manomoy's voice) , septuagenarian Sibaji's acting as kaligoti , the look of Indraniel and Arpita(she has never looked this beautiful) some witty lines which only RG could have come up with. Things that doesn't – the narrative of the story, some very slow sequences, uninspiring acting by mostly everybody, some dreadful casting, the ending, SUJOY GHOSH(with all due respect, even The Great Khali would have been a better Byomkesh, AMI SOTTI BOLCHI !), major alterations from the actual story by Saradindu Bandopadhyay. Why you should watch it – > RG's Swan Song > Anindya's return after subho muharat > you don't want to watch the Zanjeer remake > Nandan ticket priced@ Rs.30 > laugh at Sujoy Ghosh's acting. Things to remember: This is not a 'Byomkesh Bakshi' detective movie; it's a complex marital drama by RG where Byomkesh just features as a JAC (just another character). So, don't expect it to quench your mystery thirst (don't worry BBC's Sherlock 3 is just in the offing). But surely watch it to pay respect to one of the few auteurs that Indian cinema ever had. So long, RG!

  More

• Awful Movie

  santosh-805162015-06-04

  This movie is awfully directed. I felt story line had a great suspense potential. Byomkesh's character is awful. dialogues are awful. Despite of potential suspense story direction is very poor for this movie. With all respect to Late Rituparna Ghosh, he made this movie as an art film instead of a thriller. This could have a been a better movie than this. Sujoy Ghosh looks dull in lead character. Background music was very bad. Poor poor dialogue delivery. Byomkesh is different here than you read and imagine . This is the worst suspense movie in Bangla I ever watched.... Byomkesh does not seem to work there.. he is not thinking much.. Movie is a total disappointing. Intead watch Hindi Byomkesh series in youtube which is worth watching..

  More

• Twisted Byomkesh

  aghosal062013-12-29

  Byomkesh Bakshi is a popular private investigator character in Bengali Thrillers and created by late Sri Sharadendu Banerjee. In recent years Byomkes Bakshi has been revitalized in Bengali cinema after a long gap in late 60s when Shri Satyajit Ray made "Chiriyakhana" which is the first Byomkesh movie. This Byomkesh cinema is based on the story named as "chorabali" which Shri Ghosh renamed as "Satyenshi". The original story was modified and extended in order to make a full length feature film. However in doing so the flavor of the thriller is completely lost .Instead of focusing on the detail of the investigation Shri Ghosh brought in personal relationship issues with Byomkesh set aside. Anyone will say that the three name game is a poor investigative strategy. The script is very weak and the whole pace of the movie is extremely slow. In the last scene it was not clear why Himangshu was bilnd-folded although it was a night of new moon and it would be more natural in the dark that Himangshu can show his sound detection hit capability ( shabdovedi). It appears to me that Shri Ghosh just trying to use the Byomkesh brand name in making the movie but on the core he put his own agenda which has no connection with the thriller.

  More

• Will make you fall asleep

  Subijay2013-12-30

  Movie is dull. Casting was awful. Direction is pathetic. While there is a whole new wave of same old sleuth, private/consulting detectives being created worldwide, it is very likely to expect Byomkesh in a rejuvenated format. The re-incarnation of Sherlock created by BBC or our own Feluda by Sandip Ray has raised the bars. Byomkesh could not cross this hurdle. Even the two Byomkesh movies played by Aabir (I don't remember the names) was better. Even more irony - Ajit looked smarter and sharper than Byomkesh. You can refrain from watching this movie even if you are a die hard Byomkesh fan. No harm done. Nothing to lose.

  More

• Instrument of torture

  adrita-894-6394442014-01-11

  Why, why, WHY was this allowed by any self-respecting Bangali to see the light of day? There sure is a crime involved in this story - and that is the brutal and vicious murder of one of the greatest icons of Bengali literature, Byomkesh Bakshi. It is also a highly irresponsible and arrogant act of ripping apart one of the best detective stories written in Bengali. What infernal right did Rituparno Ghosh have to do any of this? Most of the characters in the film cannot even pronounce Bengali words without a spurious "English" accent, Sujoy Ghosh (who is he??)included. No one can act to save their lives. Even the veteran actor playing Kaligati delivers his lines with unnatural pauses between words, in a singsong voice, reminding you of high school plays. Anindya as Ajit is tubby, insipid and only marginally better than the rest. And Sujoy Ghosh as Byomkesh makes you want to cry. When I watched Shubho Muhurat a long time ago, I was amazed by the taut screenplay, wonderful adaptation of the Agatha Christie story, and the handling of the mystery by the director. I can go back to that movie again and again to watch Rakhi, Sumanta Mukherjee and character actors like Rajesh Sharma. It is tragic to see the same director deliver something like "Satyanweshi." This film has scarred me for life. The 2012 Byomkesh film Anjan Dutt made with Abir Chatterjee and Saswata (based on Chitrachor) was an infinitely better film. That's because Anjan Dutt chose not to deviate from the story unnecessarily, wrote a really smart screenplay, and chose people who knew their business - i.e. acting. Although Abir lacked the polish and finesse of Saswata, he looked right and was competent if not scintillating. Keeping the narration in was a great idea too. Probably this movie worked because the director, for once, was not trying to be smart. Sometimes, it pays to acknowledge that you are not God but just another film director, who is capable of making bad movies as well as good ones. A bad film is a bad film. An awful film is an awful film, and it is not wrong to say so. Even if its director is dead, even if it is his "swan song", even if he has made some good movies in the past. And I think it is high time we grew up and stopped idolizing our "famous" Bengalis. Rituparno had potential, he made some good movies, and he made some bad movies. That doesn't make him any less. And it certainly does not make him God.

  More