The Legend of Harrow Woods (2011) Reviews

• What on EARTH is this?

  dipsy-lee542012-01-19

  This is a film that should spark change. Real change in the world of film! It's one of those rare productions that cause a ripple and everyone get's together and says, YES we need change! - and that change is that we need to be able to give a film 0/10!! You're probably wondering why I let my eyeballs suffer such awful torment for the duration but I am slightly masochistic and I wouldn't want to review a title unless it had been seen in it's (almost) entirety. I'm not sure where to begin, but I would like to keep my review brief because I've already wasted enough time on this film. Firstly I watched the 3D version.. 3D??? it was barely 1D and the ridiculous glasses just made things look red, which gave me a headache. I must have fallen unconscious for the next hour because I don't remember anything. The premise of the film is that a club of friends get together to try and work out strange goings on, (they're going for a cross between Scoobie Do and Most Haunted). One of the girls has a birthday and so they all argue a bit and decide to go to a spooky wood called Harrow. According to the computer hacker character, wikipedia states that a witch perished there and made the place haunted. Then when we get there we find out that it's got a wooden hut and inside is very similar to the haunted hotel in the Shining, complete with blood tidal wave (made with lots of buckets of ketchup). The story doesn't really go anywhere at this point and instead the director starts acting and talking to Ric Mayal in tongues, which is kind of hard to understand because it's quite muffly. Then it cuts back to the friends who are dead/dying because of the witch's curse. That's it. The End. 0/10

• If only they made it, what it could have been.......

  ben-bradfield2012-03-21

  Before I begin I would just like to say that I am a massive fan of cult horrors, which I believed this had the potential to be. I found this title and thought... "I bet it will be cool"....."eclectic cast and a decent enough synopsis"...."should be interesting" ..urmm.... Well..... I learned the hard way. English people talking with an unconvincing American accent? A storyline which just about made sense, but only if you try real hard? And the acting? well it is the only situation in my life, that I am glad Jason Donovan was involved. Rik Mayall as ever did a Sterling job, but the rest of the cast were mediocre, at the very best! I don't want to spoil the plot, but if I am honest, I struggled to find one. There is one there, but you need to really be on your toes to find it, you are certainly not gonna be smacked in the face with it! The effects and camera work I did like, but that is what I was expecting, use of interesting camera shots and effects, not necessarily ground breaking stuff, but more than worthy of this style of film. It is just a shame that they were linked together so badly with such an appalling plot. If you like films which don't make much sense, has dodgy acting with unconvincing accents, and the potential to be a great cult horror but just falls short of the mark, then this is for you ...

• Interesting film

  wideopenvision2008-04-02

  Very Random cast for a horror film, but that's kind of what made me want to see it in the first place. Not a typical slasher film, far from it. It's more a slow burning psychological film really. Rik Mayall is on top form! And Jason Donovon puts in a good performance as a sleazy internet hermit. Richard Waters is very good too. Got the typical qualities of a horror movie, in nudity and gore! The plot is quite complex, but it does get you thinking which is never a bad thing. Good film, worth a watch...

• Dull Yet Inexplicably Slow

  dcarsonhagy2017-01-18

  To say I was leery in watching this would be an understatement. After all, the first thing this movie had going against it was its title. "666: Salem Calling" sounds like a bad site for rent-a- woman. But I digress. The second thing was it billed Christopher Walken as being in the movie. I watched it and I never saw Christopher Walken. I don't know where his character was, if they just used him as a voice-over for some other character, but I never saw him. Thirdly, I have never been so confused by a movie in my entire life. It's as though the director played hopscotch while filming--we are in the present; no, we're in the past; no we're in the future; no, were camping; no, we're...who the hell knows? The story (and I am taking a lot of liberties with my explanation) is supposed to be about a writer and his family who decided to go spend some time in their cabin...and then promptly disappeared off the face of the earth. Oh, and there is this mind-numbing use of Edgar Allen Poe's "The Raven" regurgitated throughout this mess. Rated "R" for lots of nudity and language.

• Delirious!

  parry_na2016-04-30

  Here's fun: a horror film starring Rik Mayall, Robin Askwith, Christopher Walken, Norman Wisdom and Jason Donovan. It appears to have three titles. Apart from the above, this has also been known as Evil Calls and Alone in the Dark (not least on the DVD extras). Investigating this online, the film seems to have a real-life history just as bizarre as anything contained in the fiction. My guess is that Harrow Woods is actually two films spliced together to create a rather delirious whole. The bulk of it is set in Harrow Woods, New England (inexplicably meaning that the predominantly British cast – as well as Donovan – have to struggle with wavering American accents), while there are the scenes set mainly in a hotel washroom that feature Mayall, Askwith, Wisdom and Richard Driscoll. Driscoll wrote, directed and produced this, as well as starred in it, just as he did in his other two released films. With a few more plot explanations, this would have been a much more enjoyable exercise. However, it seems Driscoll isn't overly concerned with clarifying every single plot point – something I have no problem with usually. But there is too much left unsaid. Walken's contribution is a narrated reading of Poe's The Raven over many early scenes – but (apart from brief flashes of raven eyes in segue-ways between various scenes) there seems to be no relevance between this and anything we actually see. Mayall and Wisdom appear to be playing versions of the same character; they have identical dialogue which they share with Driscoll's character, George Carney. And it is the disappearance of Carney that propels the story. He appears to have stayed in a hotel that was built on a site of land where a witch was burned to death many years ago, and her 'spell' fuels his paranoia (that leads to a Jack Torrance-like madness) that his wife is having an affair with the character played by Robin Askwith. This is not plainly detailed, we have to work to come to this conclusion, amidst impressive scenes of sepia-toned parties, gallons of blood, a demon baby and plenty of topless women. Oh, and an old man watching events on a computer screen who doesn't have anything to do with anything. And this is the problem – there's too much going on here, as if there were too many ideas being injected into the production. If some of these ideas had been left for another film, and more time allowed to clarify what is actually going on here, then this would have been compelling. Some skillful production values are on show here, it's a shame they couldn't have been streamlined to create a more coherent whole. And not insisting on American accents that drag down many of the cast's performances would help too. The Legend of Harrow Woods took a long time to complete. Almost ten years in fact. And clearly it has been a labour of love for Driscoll, who returned to the project regularly when finances allowed, to insert extra footage and moments that both clarify and further obfuscate the narrative. The ending suggests that none of the events in the film have actually happened yet, which doesn't help make sense of anything.